What comparative technique is most commonly used during the Course of Action Comparison step in MDMP?

The Decision Matrix is the most commonly used comparative technique during the Course of Action Comparison step in the Military Decision-Making Process (MDMP). This technique allows planners to systematically evaluate multiple courses of action against established criteria, providing a clear and structured method to assess the relative strengths and weaknesses of each option. By utilizing a Decision Matrix, teams can assign weight to different criteria depending on their importance, facilitating a quantifiable comparison between courses of action based on various factors such as feasibility, acceptability, and suitability. This helps in making an informed decision that aligns with mission objectives and strategic goals.

While other techniques like SWOT Analysis, Risk Assessment, and Flow Charts have their own valuable applications in planning and analysis, they do not provide the same structured comparative framework that the Decision Matrix offers specifically for evaluating multiple options in a systematic manner. Each of those methods focuses on different aspects of analysis rather than direct comparison, making the Decision Matrix the most appropriate choice in this context.